Genetic Architecture and Character Association Analysis for Yield and Some Quality Components in .Spring Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology, Meerut
Abstract
The present investigation was carried out with 15 parents and 44 F1's developed from
line x tester mating design. The parental lines (11 lines and 4 testers) were grown during rabi,
2012-2013 and 44 cross combinations among lines and testers were made and the seeds of
parental lines and 44 crosses were procured. The parents and F1s were evaluated in a
Randomized Completely Block Design in three replications at Crop Research Centre (Chirodi
Block) of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut (U.P.)
during rabi, 2013-14. The observations were recorded for eighteen quantitative characters viz;
days to ear emergence, days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, plant height (em), peduncle
length (em), spike length (em), spikelets per spike, productive tillers per plant, grains per
spike, flag leaf area ( cm2
), biological yield per plant (g), grain yield per plant (g), harvest
index (%), 1000 grain weight (g), gluten content (%), protein content (%), ash content (%),
and phenol colour reaction (grading) and data of these eighteen traits were subjected to
statistical and biometrical analysis except for phenol colour reaction, to find out analysis of
variance, combining ability variance and effects, estimates of heritability, genetics advance in
percent of mean, correlation coefficient, path coefficient and extent of heterosis. Data on
phenol colour reaction was recorded in five grades,black, dark brown, light brown, light
colour on edge and no colour. Parents and crosses were grouped in these five categories.
Analysis ofvariance (ANOVA) revealed that a wide amount of variability among the
genotypes were present for all the traits under study. Estimates of phenotypic coefficient of
variation (PCV) was higher than the genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) for all the traits,
but little differences were recorded between ·PCV and corresponding GCV values for all the
traits, which indicated that there was not much influence of environment in the expression of
the traits, under study. High estimates (>30 %) of heritability in narrow sense were found for
characters namely, biological yield per plant, peduncle length, plant height and days to 50 %
flowering while, medium estimates of heritability in narrow sense were recorded for eleven
characters. High genetic advance in % of mean were found for ash content followed by grain
yield per plant, harvest index and flag leaf area. High heritability (narrow sense) coupled with
moderate genetic advance in percent of mean were observed for biological yield per plant,
peduncle length and plant height and moderate heritability coupled with high genetic advance
were recorded for ash content, harvest index and flag leaf area, this indicated that these traits
rna~ be relied upon while selecting the genotypes for improvement in wheat. Analysis of
v~nance for combining ability revealed that variance gca among female lines was found
highly significant for four traits viz; days to 50 % flowering, peduncle length, spike length,
a?d . biological yield per plant, and for one trait namely ash content it was found only
Slg~lficant, while variance gca among males (testers) was found non-lgnificant for all the
traits. However, variance sea among crosses due to interaction between females x males (F1s)
was found to be highly significant for all the characters under study. These findings indicated
that both the additive and non-additive gene actions played a predominance role in expression
of the characters under study hence, appropriate breeding strategies could be adopted such as
pedigree selection, heterosis breeding, biparental mating, reciprocal recurrent selection, while
making improvement in wheat crop. Parents NW5038, RW346, RAJ4246, HD2824, GW433
and DBW17 were good general combiners for yield and quality traits. These lines may be
handled in a cross breeding programme through pedigree selection for better improvement in
wheat crop. However, parents, NW5038, GW433 were common good general combiners for
grain yield per plant with light colour reaction (at 1 % phenol solution); parents NW5038,
RAJ4246, DBW90, RW346 and HD2967 for gluten content; RAJ4246 and UP2565 for
protein content; RAJ4246, DBW90 and HD2733 for ash content. These parents could also be
involved in crossing programme followed by pedigree selection for improving yield and
quality traits and for having broad genetic base in wheat. Cross combinations HD2824 x
DBW17, HD2824 x HD2967, NW5038 x HD2967 and HD3095 x HD2733 showed highly
significant sea effects along with good per se performance for grain yield per plant, and also
for some other important yield and quality components. These cross combinations may be
exploited in heterosis breeding programme for better improvement of yield and quality in
wheat crop. Cross combinations, HD2824 x DBW17, RW346 x HD2733, HD2824 x
HD2967, NW5038 x HD2967, HD3095 x HD2733, HD3095 x DBW17, and GW433 x
HD2967 were found superior on the basis of significant sea effect and good per se
performance for yield and its components, these combinations could also be exploited in
heterosis breeding programme. Crosses HD2824 x DBW17, HD3095 x HD2733 and GW433
x HD2967 were common for grain yield per plant and phenol colour reaction, crosses
HD2824 x DBW17, NW5038 x HD2967 and HD3095 x HD2733 were common for grain
yield per plant and ash content; crosses HD2824 x HD2967 was common for grain yield per
plant, gluten content and protein content; cross HD2824 x DBW J 7 was recorded as common
for grain yield per plant, early maturity, ash content and phenol colour reaction; cross
NW5038 x HD2967 was recorded as common for grain yield per plant, early maturity and ash
content; cross HD3095 x HD2733 was common for grain yield per plant, phenol colour
reaction, and ash content (a trait showing approximate picture of mineral matter present in the
wheat grain). These cross combinations may be exploited in heterosis breeding programme
for better improvement of yield and quality in wheat. Grain yield per plant exhibited highly
significant and positive association with harvest index, biological yield per plant, flag leaf
area, spikelets per spike and days to maturity. Thus, it can be inferred that by improving these
characters either alone or in combination the yield in wheat may be improved. Genotypic and
phenotypic path coefficient revealed that harvest index and biological yield per plant had high
(0.30 to 1.00) direct effect on grain yield, therefore, direct selection for these two traits would
be effective for further yield improvement in wheat genotypes. Genotypic path coefficient
revealed that days to ear emergence had very high (> 1) negative direct effect while, days to 50
% flowering had very high (>I) positive and direct effect on protein content, so direct
selection of genotypes for protein content through these characters may be effective.
Seventeen hybrids were considered as superior F1 hybrids where the significant heterosis(%)
over check variety (HD2967) was observed in range of 16.66 % to 44.65 % for grain yield.
By exploiting these cross combinations through heterosis breeding programme will lead in
development of promising hybrid population for high productivity in wheat.
